St. Paul city officials and the Minnesota Wild are scaling back plans to renovate the Xcel Energy Center complex with a new pitch for $50 million from the state, a fraction of their original request.
After legislators’ icy response to the March proposal of $769 million, half of which would have come from the state, the city and NHL team offered a $488 million alternative Thursday that focuses solely on the 25-year-old arena.
The previous plan included improvements to the adjacent Roy Wilkins Auditorium and St. Paul RiverCentre. The city, which owns all three facilities, would likely seek funding for those upgrades in future years, according to a news release.
Under the new proposal, St. Paul and local partners would contribute $200 million, and the Wild would cover the rest of the costs. The state dollars would help the arena increase accessibility, reduce congestion, update restroom plumbing and improve security by expanding the north wall along 5th Street.
The more modest request could still be a tough sell at the Capitol, where the Legislature is set to adjourn in less than three weeks. Several lawmakers in both chambers expressed concerns during initial presentations from Mayor Melvin Carter and Wild owner Craig Leipold, citing the state’s projected budget crunch, economic headwinds and uncertainty about federal funding.
“We recognize the serious financial decisions ahead of our lawmakers, which is why it’s important to make strategic and timely investments that move our state forward,” Carter said in a statement Thursday. “Renovating the Xcel Energy Center protects one of our most valuable assets, all while setting St. Paul and our region up for job creation, revitalization and economic growth.”
In an interview Thursday as he was preparing to head to the Capitol ahead of the Wild’s evening playoff game, Leipold said the reduced request for the state has been received “really, really well” by lawmakers in the past week.
“We didn’t change the scope of the arena,” he said. “It’s going to be everything that we wanted this to be. … The difference is that we have, with the city, decided this is too critically important. We need to get it done this year — and so we have stepped up, and we are going to be putting more into the project."