We still need better voter turnout. Here are three suggestions.

Opinion editor’s note: Strib Voices publishes a mix of guest commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.

•••

Fewer than two-thirds of U.S. citizens of voting age participated in the presidential election this year, which is almost exactly the average over the last 100 years. Meanwhile, the average voter turnout is only about 41% during midterm elections. What can we do to increase voter turnout on Election Day? I have three specific suggestions that I believe will increase voter participation, and with that, voter confidence:

This should be a no-brainer. Let’s make Election Day a special day in Americans' lives. There are 11 federal holidays in 2024, and none would be more important to the civic health of this nation than to set aside a day to celebrate our democratic system of government. Starting next year, let’s make it a nice even 12 federal holidays by adding the first Tuesday following the first Monday in November as a paid day off.

If your job duties require that you do have to work on Election Day, your boss must make accommodations in your schedule to leave you plenty of time to vote. Going forward, Election Day should be treated as civically sacrosanct.

Do you miss the nonstop negative ads that filled the air for weeks and weeks before the election? While the advantages of ranked-choice voting (RCV) are manifold, perhaps none is greater than its tendency to change the tone of political campaigning. Here’s how that works: If candidates A and B think they may need the second-place votes of candidates C and D to put them over the top (50% + 1), they are not going to be attacking those third- and fourth-party candidates with the vehemence that they might otherwise. And if candidates A and B can think of nothing better to do than attack each other with lies and exaggeration, they risk dropping down and becoming candidates C and D themselves!

At the end of Election Day, with all the first-, second- and third-place votes tallied, we end up with leaders and representatives who received a majority of “yes” votes, not just a plurality, and sometimes a very small plurality at that. This is a great improvement to our democratic system, and will certainly generate more interest in the process.

The political parties can use whatever method they want to choose who to nominate for any particular office. This can be done in a smoke-filled backroom at their convention. It can be done with open voting at their caucuses. It can even be done with a primary election apart from the caucuses, but it’s up to the parties to run those primary elections themselves. It is really up to the parties to choose how to select the best nominees for each office.

The parties forward their choices to the state and local election boards to be listed on the general ballots. To keep the ballots from becoming unruly with dozens of names listed for each position, the state should set certain minimums of support a nominee must receive to get on the ballot. This could be based on the size of the party affiliation or on the number of signatures on a petition for inclusion for an independent candidate.

•••

We should constantly be looking for ways to improve our institutions and the systems under which they operate. Confidence in the legislative process is abysmally low, and it’s not much better for the executive and judicial branches either. We can do better. Some fundamental changes to the election system, all designed to increase voter participation, should give us more confidence in the representatives and the president we send to Washington, and more trust in the government of the United States of America.

John Crea, of St. Paul, is the author of “Shorter Workweeks & Stronger Families.”