‘Why isn’t the Minnesota Star Tribune reviewing my book?’ And other questions

Wondering how the paper decides which books to review? Read on.

Columnist Icon
The Minnesota Star Tribune
June 23, 2025 at 1:00PM
Magers and Quinn is one of many bookstores in the Twin Cities that is now closed to customers. Folks can order online and the bookstore is offering alley-side pickup.
With over 3 million new books each year, how exactly does the Star Tribune figure out which ones to feature? (Joel Koyama/The Minnesota Star Tribune)

Better get out your calculator for this one: Publishers say 3 million books are published each year in the U.S. The Minnesota Star Tribune has space to cover maybe 300 or 400 of them. So there are way more books the paper can’t cover — 2,999,600 of them to be semi-exact.

That means some decisions must be made. This is the story of how they’re made.

Take the month of June. We received 179 books for adult readers (some of which I requested, some of which were simply mailed to us in the hope that we’d write about them; I’d estimate that I open about 60-70 books each week).

Because we ran a summer preview that zipped through 24 titles earlier this month, we were able to include more books than usual, but it was still just a fraction of those 179 books and an even smaller fraction of the June books for which I received e-mailed pitches from publishers. I get at least 50 of those per day, so that would be around 2,500 per month, which works out to more than 3,000 actual books annually and 30,000 pitches. Which makes my head hurt a little.

One way for writers who’d like to be in the paper to get a leg up is to be from Minnesota, but it’s not a guarantee. The Twin Cities, and greater Minnesota, have an incredibly vibrant literary scene, with several important publishers, dozens of independent bookstores, the epicenter of the Little Free Library movement in St. Paul, punching-above-our-weight book sales (both St. Paul and Minneapolis are in the U.S. top 10) and more book clubs than you can shake a library card at.

The Star Tribune obviously wants to stay on top of that. And covering Minnesota writers, either in the form of reviews or writer interviews, is a big part of that, not just big names such as Louise Erdrich, William Kent Krueger, Kate DiCamillo and Star Tribune Artist of the Year Kao Kalia Yang but also vibrant newer talents such as Mounds View’s Mubanga Kalimamukwento and fantasy/horror writer Emma Törzs.

Many Minnesota books won’t get reviewed in national publications, so the Star Tribune does what it can to make sure they get attention here. The flipside of that, and easily the worst part of my job, is that I have to say “no” a lot. At least once a day, I get an email that begins “I’m a Minnesota writer who has a new book” and, although I do get to cover some of them, many more aren’t of broad enough interest, duplicate other books we’ve covered or are self-published (we review many books from smaller presses such as Graywolf or Coffee House but our books policy dictates that we don’t review self-published titles).

Obviously, I don’t read all the books we get. There are many that I can tell right off the bat we’re not going to cover (sorry, “Ergonomics in the Age of AI”). Some titles I instantly know we’re going to want to write about — when Pulitzer Prize winner Erdrich publishes another book, we’ll be there — but most require what I think of as the 50-page test.

When I ask publishers to send us advance copies of books, I always make sure to read the first 50 pages or so, to determine if they’re worth covering. It’s not an ideal solution — I hate giving up on a book, even if it’s awful — but it has introduced me to lots of terrific works I knew nothing about (like Kalimamukwento’s “Obligations to the Wounded” and last year’s wild “Headshot”). And it has saved you from having to read about lots of rotten ones.

My taste does enter into the equation. You may have noticed the paper is running more reviews of mysteries and thrillers, which is partly because I know lots of readers are fans and partly because I like ‘em. But when I make decisions, I’m always trying to think about our readers. Even if I don’t want to tackle a 1,000-page book about Mark Twain, I know plenty of readers are fans of its author, “Alexander Hamilton” biographer Ron Chernow, and I’m very grateful that my colleague Kevin Duchschere was eager to take it on.

When I’m lucky, writers such as Kevin will ask if they can review a book they’re looking forward to. The section needs a balance of fiction and nonfiction, and of writers (and reviewers) from a variety of backgrounds. Staffers at the paper and several freelancers contribute reviews to the books section, which means their passions also help define what makes it in. And what doesn’t. I tried to interest three reviewers in one of the big books of spring and the response from all three, two of whom did the 50-page test, was so quiet that there weren’t even crickets.

Which is not a bad thing. Occasionally, a book we hoped was going to be terrific falls flat (like Susan Choi’s “Flashlight” earlier this month). But the main thing to know about all of the people who write for the books section is this: We hope every book we write about is good, and most of them are.

about the writer

about the writer

Chris Hewitt

Critic / Editor

Interim books editor Chris Hewitt previously worked at the Pioneer Press in St. Paul, where he wrote about movies and theater.

See Moreicon

More from Books

Magers and Quinn is one of many bookstores in the Twin Cities that is now closed to customers. Folks can order online and the bookstore is offering alley-side pickup.

Louise Erdrich and Kate DiCamillo are easy calls, but how does the Minnesota Star Tribune books editor choose between the 3 million books published each year?