Sound Advice: Budget speaker pays off with great sound

Bluetooth unit available for less than $30.

By Don Lindich

Tribune News Service
January 17, 2025 at 2:43PM

I found out about the Comiso Bluetooth speaker too late for it to make my list of holiday gift recommendation. But it’s an excellent speaker, and at less than $30, it gets 2025 off to a fine start!

I was drawn to the Comiso waterproof speaker by the attractive price and excellent reputation, racking up a 4.5 star rating with over 24,000 reviews on Amazon. It’s a cylinder-shaped speaker that resembles a tall soda can, sized so it can fit in the water bottle holder of a bicycle. It is well-balanced and lightweight, with simple controls on the top.

At the regular price of $39.99, it sells for about half of a similarly sized quality Bluetooth speaker. But discounts reduce the price even more. A checkbox coupon on Amazon and the code COMISO25 bring the total down to $26.91.

This comes with the caveat, of course, that it actually sounds good. So I bought one out of curiosity.

The Comiso delivered the good sound I expected given its reputation. Everything was very clear and transparent, especially voices. In this sense it was one of the best small speakers I have tested, making it an excellent choice for listening to podcasts, the news, talk radio, internet radio or a satellite radio app. Older listeners are sure to appreciate this vocal clarity, and it makes the speaker a great choice for YouTube and streaming video watching, too.

Bass is easily controlled by adjusting the distance between the speaker and the surface behind it. I got the best results about three inches out from the wall. You can pair two of them for stereo sound with wide separation, but I only had one speaker so I could not try this feature. Nonetheless, I was impressed.

Cable has improved

Q. I have not seen you write about cable vs. satellite television in a long time. I do remember that you favored satellite over cable, but I think I read that a long time ago. Do you still have a preference?

A. These days I don’t get many questions about cable and satellite comparisons, which is why you have not seen it discussed in the column. I do get a lot of questions about cutting the cord and ditching cable or satellite, but most of those revolve around antennas and receiving local channels and combining it with streaming services.

I have subscribed to Dish since 1996, but I must admit that given the rising costs I have strongly considered cutting the cord myself. I need a cable or satellite feed to evaluate televisions, so for now it stays.

When I started writing the column in 2002, satellite had an edge over most cable providers. Digital satellite delivered resolution close to DVD quality. Cable, even digital cable, approximated the picture quality of VHS tape.

Today, you get great picture quality from either cable or satellite. You can check J.D. Power for television service provider satisfaction based on region. Currently cable has the edge over satellite, and live TV streaming has the highest satisfaction of all. I definitely get a better picture watching “Chopped” streamed from Max than off my Dish Hopper, and streamed NFL games look better than the satellite box, too.

Send questions to Don Lindich at donlindich@gmail.com. Get recommendations and read past columns at soundadvicenews.com.

about the writer

about the writer

Don Lindich

Tribune News Service