Opinion editor’s note: Strib Voices publishes a mix of commentary online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
It doesn’t matter how you voted last November. This week is turning into one of the most stunningly confusing moments in the recent history of American federal governance.
It feels as if we’re all being herded into a house of mirrors by a president unbound by convention, who now freely flashes signs of his unbridled thirst for government by fiat.
Hours before a U.S. District Court judge issued an order Tuesday temporarily blocking a Trump directive to freeze spending on all federal grants and loans, the nation found itself abruptly plunged headfirst into chaos. The freeze could have caused untold harm to a sweeping array of federal programs from education, Medicaid, law enforcement, low-income housing, to countless other services vital to the American public.
As the bipartisan uproar grew by the hour, however, the Trump White House appeared to sense, if not belatedly understand, it was racing into legally questionable territory — and widely unpopular funding freezes. The administration has abruptly reversed course.
It provided clarity that the freeze warning does not include Medicaid, which provides medical care to the poor and the elderly. It also issued a brief statement saying that it was rescinding the freeze outlined just a day earlier in a memo originating out of the Office of Budget and Management.
But even before that freeze recalibration could set, the White House took pains to clarify that a full thaw wasn’t the intent after all. Instead, it outlined what appears to have been the administration’s priority objectives all along. The proposal may have simply been a trial balloon.