A federal official revived an effort to place St. Paul's Hamline Midway Library on the National Register of Historic Places, a victory for preservationists opposed to the city's plan to demolish the 92-year-old building to make way for a new one.
Joy Beasley, keeper of the National Register, sent a letter to Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer Amy Spong on Oct. 11 saying the library's nomination should be presented to the State Historic Preservation Review Board, despite objections from city officials.
"This was a very good piece of news for us," said Barbara Bezat, a historic preservation researcher who wrote the library's nomination and appealed its case after city leaders halted the consideration process.
The library at 1558 W. Minnehaha Av. has been a source of controversy for more than a year, since the city started exploring the possibility of tearing down the building. A new library would be built in its place. A coalition of neighbors and preservationists opposed the plan, saying the city should instead renovate the existing Collegiate Gothic-style building.
The nomination must still receive approval at the state and federal levels for the library to be added to the register, and the designation would not prevent the city from tearing down the property.
But the listing would require the city to go through additional review processes before construction, potentially affecting the $8.1 million project's timeline and budget, according to St. Paul library officials. Construction is slated to start next spring.
"The city continues to object to the nomination of the building to the National Register of Historic Places," said Barb Sporlein, St. Paul's interim library director, in a statement. "We are excited to move forward with our plan, which is based on community input and multiple building assessments by industry experts, to build a new library that bridges the past and the future and maximizes accessibility, is environmentally responsible, and meets the current and long-term needs and desires of the community."
Opponents of the city's plan — who have organized under the name Renovate 1558 — have called prior engagement efforts "a sham of a process" designed to reach a predetermined outcome. Nearly 3,000 people signed a petition objecting to the demolition plan.