Despite objections from school librarians, the Rochester Public Schools have removed an LGBTQ-themed children’s book from its shelves based on its depictions of public nudity.
The district said the decision to pull the book, “The Rainbow Parade” by Emily Neilson, came after a parent at Franklin Elementary School raised concerns about the book’s illustrations while reading it with their first-grader.
The book tells the story of a child who attends an LGTBQ parade with her two moms. Two pages of the book show people in the parade who are nude or partially nude.
In a memo to the Rochester school board explaining the decision, Superintendent Kent Pekel said that while he strongly supports inclusion of books that celebrate lives and experiences of LGBTQ people — he grew up with a gay father — the depictions of public nudity make it inappropriate for an elementary school media center.
“... My decision to remove the book from the shelves of one of our elementary school libraries does not constitute denial or diminishment of the life experience of LGBTQ people in any way,” Pekel wrote. “It is simply a reflection of my conclusion that the nudity depicted in the book is inappropriate for placement on the open shelves of a library where students as young as five and six years of age can pick up the book.”
Before Pekel’s decision, the book went through a reconsideration process involving a committee of community members, teachers and media specialists. The committee overwhelmingly voted to recommend keeping the book on the shelves on the grounds of intellectual freedom.
“Not all books are for everyone, but our goal is to have books that represent all students in our school district,” said Tammy Van Moer, media department chair at the district.
On Tuesday, Rochester school board members shared mixed opinions on the superintendent’s decision, which by rule is final. While the board voted to take the procedural step of sending the superintendent’s recommendation to the Minnesota Department of Education, some members said they were concerned about the precedent it could set.