The recent chronic delays and cancellations at New Jersey's largest airport have highlighted the shortage of air traffic controllers and the aging equipment they use, which President Donald Trump's administration wants to replace.
The Federal Aviation Administration is working on a short-term fix to the problems at the Newark airport that includes technical repairs and cutting flights to keep traffic manageable while dealing with a shortage of controllers. Officials met with some of the airlines that fly out of Newark on Wednesday to discuss the plan, and those conversations will continue on Thursday.
But even before those problems, aviation was already in the spotlight ever since the deadly midair collision of a passenger jet and a U.S. Army helicopter above Washington, D.C., in January, and a string of other crashes and mishaps since then. The investigations into those crashes continue while the U.S. Department of Transportation tries to make progress on the long-standing issues of not having enough air traffic controllers and relying on outdated equipment. A U.S. Senate hearing on Wednesday focused on the FAA's efforts.
What happened in Newark?
Twice in the past two-and-a-half weeks, the radar and communications systems that air traffic controllers in Philadelphia who direct planes in and out of Newark rely on failed for a short time. That happened because the main line that carries the radar signal down from another FAA facility in New York failed, and the backup line didn't work immediately.
So the controllers were left unable to see or talk to the planes around Newark Liberty International Airport for as long as 90 seconds on April 28 and May 9. The lines — some of which were old copper wires — failed a third time on Sunday, but that time the backup system worked and the radar stayed online.
The FAA's head of air traffic controllers, Frank McIntosh, said during the Senate hearing on Wednesday that he believes the planes remained safe because of what they had been directed to do beforehand, but acknowledged that 90 seconds is ''a long disruption for a radar screen to go blank or not to be able to talk to aircraft.''
''I don't believe there was a heightened significant danger to the flying public. But with that being said, from where I sit, we want to remove all risk to the flying public,'' McIntosh said. ''And that is what's concerning to me is how do we remove any bit of that risk. And we need to make sure our contingencies are better placed.''